Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- 193802 [2015/12/15 13:27] – [Hiking in Shorts Through the City] emmanuelle_c
+++ 193802 [2015/12/15 13:29] – [Melbourne Men Walkers 43 Years Old and Still Young.] emmanuelle_c
@@ Line 259: / Line 259: @@
 ==== Melbourne Men Walkers 43 Years Old and Still Young. ====
-The annual report of the Molbounlo Walking and Touring Club helps to remove the bad
+The annual report of the Melbourne Walking and Touring Club helps to remove the bad taste left by that shocking motoring article in "The Melbourne Walker". The club itself appears to be very active judging by the number of walks and the numbers that patronize them. On re-union walks they seem to average about 40 and on Ladies' Day Walks a total of about 90. The club now numbers 171, but is calling out for increased membership. The Canadian Alpine Club is doing the same thing. On the other hand the Sydney Bush Walkers complain that their membership grows too rapidly. Apparently clubs always covet what they have not. It would be an interesting subject for an inter-club debate, the question of whether a large or small membership is more desirable.
-taste left by that shocking motoring article in "The Melbourne Walker". The club itself appears to be very active judging by the number of walks and the numbers that patronize
-them. On re-union walks they seem to average about 40 and on Ladiest Day Walks a total of about 90. The club now numbers 171, but is calling out for increased membership. The Canadian Alpine Club is doing the same thing. On the other hand the Sydney Bush-
-Walkers complain that their membership grows too rapidly. Apparently clubs always covet what they have not. It would be an interesting subject for an inter-club debate, the question of whether a large or small membership is more desirable.
 (Forty-third Annual Report of the Melbourne Walking and Touring Club).